Volume 5, Number 17: Kielbasa Frittata

In an effort to expand my limited recipe repertoire past "chef salads," "grilled cheese," "BLT sandwiches," "that slow-cooked kielbasa/potatoes/sauerkraut dish," "potato latkes," "throwing pieces of meat on a George Foreman grill" and "chimichitos," tonight I am going to cook a kielbasa frittata, as per this recipe. (FYI I'm leaving out the caraway seeds--I hate those--but otherwise will not be altering the recipe.) The whole started when I thought "kielbasa frittata" sounded funny and it got me wondering if it actually existed.

Now, on to miscellaneous bits and pieces I'd like to share:

• So long as I began with food, I need to add two more items to "Foods I Miss": Chef Boyardee Canneloni and Chef Boyardee Meat Tortellini. I realize that, under ConAgra's iron fist ownership, the Chef Boyardee brand has been repositioned more towards appealing to kids, but simply put, the products they've added towards that end (forkables, twistaroni) are not nearly as good as those discontinued products. Besides, making silly-shaped pasta isn't the only way to make canned pasta appealing to kids. Kids like to try new things! Chef Boyardee is how I discovered canneloni and tortellini in the first place!
• I'd like to see bad movies take a stab at quoting negative reviews for promotional purposes. That way, when people who like good and great movies (and check out rottentomatoes.com, a web site that has saved me from wasting money on seeing bad films a few times) find out that The Last Airbender is a piece of crap, and don't come to see it, the studio that produced the film (in this case, Paramount) can then cut its losses by deliberately re-marketing it to people who actually get gratification from watching crappy movies. A TV ad for The Last Airbender could thus go like this:

Four nations discover a common destiny in...

"A soul-crushing disaster." - Todd Gilchrist, Cinematical
"A new low point in M. Night Shyamalan's crumbling career." - Mark Dujsik, Sci-Fi Movie Page
See why The Last Airbender "makes The Golden Compass look like a four-star classic." - Ty Burr of the Boston Globe
Don't miss "The most well-rounded failure of the year so far" - Neil Miller, Film School Rejects

---

• David Tennant wore this really awesome "muscle torso" T-shirt (shown above) in the 2009 Royal Shakespeare production of Hamlet. Anyone know where in the US I can get a shirt just like it? (And I mean EXACTLY like it--same color, same "muscle pattern," and yes, I've already looked on eBay!)
• Here's a great promotional giveaway idea for baseball games: Foreign Legion-style hats (an example of which is shown here). The big flap on the back offers great sun protection for your neck--and also gives a big space for the people giving them away to put a big advertisement on the back!
• Why can't anyone design office chairs that are more like the bucket seats in cars? I keep imagining such chairs would be more comfortable.
• Can't we have a rear car horn to honk back at any schmuck honking at us (or, for that matter, any idiot who swoops into my blind spot right when I'm about to change lanes)?
• If you like new wave/punk rock/alternative rock from the '80s, check out KROQ-HD2. It's a re-creation of the mix of music KROQ played in the '80s (which, in turn, is a lot like the music WABX played in '82 and '83, which is where my fondness for new wave music stems from).

Volume 5, Number 16: Baseball All-Star Tweaks

Recently, Bud Selig made a couple changes to the All-Star Game that I feel are a joke. First and foremost is expanding the All-Star Game rosters (like the game hasn’t been slowed down enough with all the substitutions already being made now in an effort to get every player to make his appearance). That also cheapens the value of making the All-Star team. The second is having the DH rule every year, regardless of whether the host city/ballpark are in the American League or not. Uh, given that the All-Star Game determines home field advantage in the World Series*, and you’re a National League manager, you should be fuming that every single such game will now be played under the AL’s rules.

* (That’s another Selig tweak I was never fond of—home field should always go to the team with the better record, like in the NBA and NHL.)

I do believe changes need to be made. But the ones I have in mind are different. I mentioned them back in 2006, and I’ll reiterate them below:

First, and a number of baseball writers have said this, it's not necessary to have every single team represented at the All-Star Game because it leads to crummy players making the All-Star rosters while more deserving players are forced to miss out. Take Mark Redman of the Kansas City Royals in the 2006 All-Star Game. Any pitcher with an ERA over 5 (as Redman did that year) should not be allowed within 1,000 feet of the ballpark, much less be on an All-Star roster.

Second, and this one may be met with some disagreement (but just hear me out), is this: Being a top vote-getter in the All-Star balloting should guarantee that they will play at least 3 innings in the All-Star game, nothing more. The managers should be allowed more power in determining the starting lineup.

How do I back up my argument? Two simple words: Reggie Jackson. Some of you remember the early '80s, when Jackson was a perennial top vote-getter (indeed, one of the most popular players the game has ever seen). Trouble is, his defensive skills had eroded so severely that AL All-Star managers at that time cringed at the prospect of having to start him in right field.

One factor that favors my second little tweak is television. I'll bet that the majority of viewers will tune away from the All-Star Game by the time the 6th or 7th inning rolls around. Would they tune away so quickly if certain favorite players had just gotten into the game (or were still on the bench, waiting to enter)? I don't think they would. Going back to Reggie Jackson, it would have been more intriguing to see him come into the game in the 6th inning as a pinch-hitter for the pitcher (supposing for the moment that said game was being played in an NL park) than to see him butchering the NL team’s base hits in the bottom of the 1st.

In summation, the question driving the ballot shouldn't be "Who do you want to start in the All-Star Game," but just "Who do you want to SEE in the All-Star Game?"

Volume 5, Number 15: The Post-World War III NFL-USFL Merger

Today, I was going through some old creative writing of mine and came across an idea that basically came from mixing two interests: Alternate history stories and fantasy sports.

Some time ago, I imagined a TV series in which a newspaper columnist finds himself stranded in a parallel universe, a world in which (among other things) the United States lost 12 western states to the Soviet Union in March 1986, during the Third World War.

One of the more trivial ramifications of such a loss would take place in the world of sports. Both the National Football League and the nascent United States Football League would have lost franchises as the result of the Soviets taking over the 12 western states and thus would have had to merge into a new NFL. To wit, here is how such a merger would have looked. The franchises added from the USFL are indicated in red.

NFC East:
Dallas Cowboys
New York Giants
Philadelphia Eagles
Washington Redskins
New Jersey Generals

Notes: The St. Louis Cardinals moved to Phoenix in 1985, so the Cards were stranded in the new Soviet States of America (Alaska, Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Nevada, Montana, Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico).  The New Jersey Generals were a talent-rich team, having merged with the Houston Gamblers following the 1985 season.  NFL Commissioner Pete Rozelle did not want the New York/New Jersey market to have a third NFL team, but with gas becoming a precious commodity--especially with the loss of Alaska--he could not force Generals owner Donald Trump to move his team to, say, St. Louis.

NFC Central:
Chicago Bears
Detroit Lions
Green Bay Packers
Minnesota Vikings

Notes: The Tampa Bay Buccaneers left for the newly-formed NFC South division (below). This division is thus the same as the NFC North division we have today.

NFC South:
Atlanta Falcons
Birmingham Stallions
New Orleans Saints
San Antonio Bandits
Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Notes: Birmingham finally became a big-league city as the NFL added the Stallions. The San Antonio Bandits are the result of merging one of the USFL's better franchises, the Tampa Bay Bandits (who could not compete directly with the Buccaneers and had been opposed to the USFL's decision to switch to fall football for that reason) with the San Antonio Gunslingers (one of the USFL's less successful franchises). San Antonio was one of the few markets left that might support an NFL team. The Stallions are in the NFC South--as opposed to the AFC South--so they can enjoy rivalries with the Saints (another Gulf Coast state) and the Falcons (in the neighboring state of Georgia).

AFC East:
Baltimore Stars
Buffalo Bills
New England Patriots
New York Jets

Notes: The Stars, the only team to appear in all three USFL championship games (winning two), had relocated to Baltimore from Philadelphia after the USFL's pre-war decision to compete directly with the NFL. What great timing. Baltimore gets an NFL team just two years after losing the Colts to Indianapolis, and get to play against three of the Colts' old rivals (but not the Colts themselves; they relocated to the AFC Central).

AFC Central:
Cleveland Browns
Cincinnati Bengals
Indianapolis Colts
Kansas City Chiefs
Pittsburgh Steelers

Notes: The Chiefs are the only surviving team from the old AFC West. The Houston Oilers got moved to the new AFC South division (below). The Colts join the AFC Central because, after moving to Indy, they're closer to Cincinnati and Cleveland than they are New York and New England (and the postwar American government prefers that the NFL's teams minimize all logistics costs).

AFC South:
Houston Oilers
Jacksonville Bulls
Miami Dolphins
Orlando Renegades
Memphis Showboats

Notes: The Bulls looked to be a stronger franchise after merging with the Denver Gold following the 1985 USFL season, and had great fan support already (in fact, in our universe, Jacksonville's support of the USFL Bulls was why the NFL gave that city an expansion franchise in 1995). The Renegades and Showboats were two of the teams that were preparing to play a 1986 fall season in the USFL and were more than happy to play that season as NFL teams. The Dolphins leave the AFC East for two intra-state rivalries (Bulls, Renegades), a cheaper, less tiring travel schedule, and in the short run, a much easier schedule (in addition to three ex-USFL teams--more than any other division--the 'Fins would have two games against an Oiler team that went 5-11 in 1985). Incidentally, the Dolphins and Oilers would revive a short-lived divisional rivalry; they were rivals in the old AFL Eastern Division from 1966 (when the Dolphins joined the AFL as an expansion team) to 1969 (the last season before the AFL-NFL merger, in which the Oilers moved to the newly-minted AFC Central).

Volume 5, Number 14: To Be, Or Not To Be... Smart

A few years ago, I wrote this blog entry about how I did better in courses where the right answers were clearly defined (like math and spelling) than subjects in which students could answer various ways, depending on how they interpreted the subject material (like social studies and English literature). I mentioned that I developed the need to have as many "right answers" as possible, which is why I did well in spelling bees and trivia games.

Recently, however, it dawned on me: Being smart isn't about knowing all the right answers beforehand. Being smart means asking questions when you need answers. It means knowing which question to ask to get that answer, and in some cases, finding out who to ask. Long ago, I used to think that if someone asked a question in class that they must not be smart because it meant they were having trouble grasping whatever subject the teacher was teaching.

Back in high school, I was too proud to ask my English teacher to give me a literal interpretation of certain phrases in Shakespeare--I could have sworn that some of them read like Yoda the Jedi Master had written them--because I thought the teacher was already expecting me to interpret Shakespearean correctly. Meanwhile, my mind was getting lost in words that felt like they weren't being used properly because I kept thinking of how they are used to today (e.g. it didn't occur to me that "soft" actually meant "stop" or "be quiet"; I sure could have used a reference like this back then). I never understood what the characters were really saying until recently, some 20 years later, when I saw the 2009 Royal Shakespeare Company production of Hamlet, starring David Tennant as Hamlet and the recently-knighted Sir Patrick Stewart as Claudius (he also played the ghost of Claudius' brother, Old Hamlet). I strongly recommend you see it--you may have to buy the DVD as it aired on PBS a little over a month ago--but I digress here.

Point it, I could have asked other students in the class after school as to what certain words meant or how certain parts should be read. An example is Act I, Scene II: I failed to figure out that Claudius' lines at the start of the scene were intended as a speech to the other characters on the stage, not just to one or two (and certainly not a soliloquy); and furthermore, that speech is divided into separate parts (first about his marrying Gertrude, then about Norway's continuing war with Denmark under the leadership of young Fortinbras). When I first read Hamlet, that speech seemed like nothing more than one long, rambling stream of words.

Obviously, it's better to ask a stupid question now than make a stupid mistake later.

And sometimes failing to ask questions can be the stupidest mistake of all.

Volume 5, Number 13: The Deepwater Horizon Disaster

I've heard it said many times that those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.

That statement has certainly been true with the recent BP Deepwater Horizon disaster, because there are a number of parallels between it and a similar disaster that took place in 1988: Piper Alpha, located in the North Sea (approximately 120 miles northeast of Aberdeen, Scotland), was another offshore drilling rig. It had been operating for 12 years when a series of explosions and fires destroyed it.

Errors and questionable decisions led to both disasters, which could have easily been avoided. (Here's a report about what went wrong on Deepwater Horizon. And this Wikipedia article summarizes the Piper Alpha disaster.)

And of course, both rigs were destroyed the same way--by explosions and fires.

In Piper Alpha's case, a design change was made that enabled the platform to process natural gas as well as crude oil, but the additional equipment was placed much closer to the workers' quarters than it should have been. Also, on July 6, 1988, workers had begun working on routine maintenance for a safety valve but did not finish it before their shift ended and the night shift began. The engineer in charge of the maintenance in question did not properly inform anyone that this work was not complete and that the condensate pump connected to that valve should not be operated under any circumstances.

In the Deepwater Horizon case, improper well design, the flawed design and maintenance of the blowout preventer and the ill-advised removal of "drilling mud" on the day of the disaster all played a part in the loss of that rig, the loss of 11 workers' lives, and the jeopardizing of ecosystems and people's livelihoods along the Gulf Coast.

But what really alarms--no, wait, disgusts me is how BP has allowed the disaster to become even worse (in ecological terms) than Piper Alpha. Famous firefighter, the late Paul "Red" Adair, was able to put out the Piper Alpha fire and cap the leaking oil wells in three weeks. Deepwater Horizon has been lost for a month now and all BP has done (other than point blame at Halliburton and Transocean) is stick a little bendy straw into the leak to siphon off a small fraction of the oil. Here's a live video feed of the leak, 5,000 feet below the surface of the Gulf of Mexico.

The executives at BP keep saying they'll have this leak plugged "next week," refuse to use a less-toxic oil dispersant than the one they've been using, and presumably continue to pay themselves the same as they've been over recent years. Are they aware that they're constructing a better advertisement for the abolition of offshore drilling than the Greenpeace folks could ever dream of?

Volume 5, Number 12: The NBA Draft Lottery and Why I Don't Like It

Next Tuesday night, sports bars across Detroit could well be packed with die-hard Detroit Pistons fans hoping their team gets the first pick in next month's NBA Draft, by virtue of winning the NBA Draft Lottery. I won't be among them. In my previous blog entry, I mentioned that I am opposed to that Lottery. The best draft among the major pro sports is the NFL Draft (in which the team with the worst record is first in the draft order, barring any expansion teams entering the league--no lottery). I stated my opposition to the Lottery in a letter I published in the Detroit News on March 17, 1985 (see below--not very well written, but in all fairness, the News cut out at least one "reason" to make the letter fit, and I was in 7th grade to begin with). David Stern introduced the Draft Lottery after Dallas Mavericks head coach Dick Motta made allegations about the Houston Rockets throwing games in order to get the first pick in the 1984 Draft (they lost 14 of their last 17 games, got the first pick and would select center Hakeem Olajuwon). In addition, the Chicago Bulls went 1-14 in its final 15; they secured the third pick and would take now-legendary guard Michael Jordan with that pick. Those losses may support Motta's argument, but that doesn't make it iron-clad. Let me poke a couple holes in it. Generally speaking, when a sports team racks up so many losses, the cause is, simply put, a lack of talent, which in turn comes from these factors:

• Bad drafting. Detroit Lions followers like me need no more than two words: Matt Millen. None of the players he drafted between 2002 and 2006 are members of the Lions today. Also, the Detroit Tigers had a string of bad drafts when Randy Smith was their GM, which meant that by the time owner Mike Ilitch fired him in 2002, the farm system was virtually devoid of talent.
• Bad trading. Like when the Pistons traded M.L. Carr and two #1 picks to the Boston Celtics for Bob McAdoo (allegedly at the urging of then-Pistons head coach Dick Vitale). (Those picks became the first and thirteenth overall picks.  The Celtics would trade them to Golden State in 1980 for the third overall pick--which they used to select PF Kevin McHale--and C Robert Parish.  McHale and Parish would solidify the Celtics' frontcourt and help Boston win three NBA titles.) Or when the late Ted Stepien, who owned the Cleveland Cavaliers 30 years ago, traded away five future #1 picks for mediocre players he thought would be stars (in particular, he traded the 1982 #1 pick, which turned out to be forward James Worthy, to the Lakers in a February 1980 deal for forward Don Ford; he also dealt the #1 picks from 1983 to 1986 to the Dallas Mavericks in other trades; as a matter of fact, the NBA made a rule prohibiting the trades of first-round picks in consecutive years because of his bungling, informally known as the Ted Stepien Rule).
• Injuries. The 1996-97 San Antonio Spurs were decimated by injuries (most notably star center David Robinson; forward Sean Elliott also missed half the season). As the result, a team that had averaged 59 wins over the previous three seasons finished 20-62.
• Economics. Over the years, teams in various sports have had to gut their payroll, either due to debt or (as in the case of the 1998 Florida Marlins in baseball) the new owner didn't want to take on the old owner's payroll. Oftentimes, teams have too much money tied up in bad contracts, which precludes them from spending money on players they need. (The Detroit Tigers of the Randy Smith era are a big example; Smith signed Jeff Weaver, Damion Easley, Dean Palmer and Bobby Higginson to long-term deals. He also offered Juan Gonzalez a monstrous 8-year, $120 million pact that, had JuanGon signed it, would have paved the way for the Tigers to declare bankruptcy.)

Looking back at the Rockets, they had lost their best player, Moses Malone, to the Philadelphia 76ers in 1982. Even with Malone, over the previous four seasons (1978-79 through 1981-82), the Rockets had never more than 47 games in a season. They went 14-68 in the 1982-83 season, not because they threw away games, but because after Malone's departure, they had no other talent. What's more, sports teams are, frankly, too smart to throw games to get the #1 pick. Here are a few reasons why it would be against a team's best interest to do so:

• #1 picks get bigger contracts with more guaranteed money and they (and the teams that pick them) face more media pressure.
• Besides, having a high pick is not always an iron-clad guarantee you'll get a player who can improve your team. (I also touched upon this in my 1985 letter to the Detroit News, noting that Ralph Sampson did nothing to turn around the Houston Rockets' fortunes.) In the NFL, over the last nine drafts, the Lions and the Oakland Raiders have had top-10 picks year after year, with no winning seasons to show for it. The NBA is no stranger to #1 busts (Joe Barry Carroll, Danny Manning, most recently Kwame Brown).
• Teams that throw games lose the respect of their fans as well as that of other teams.
• Sports team owners generally understand that the main business they are in is winning games, not selling jerseys, building a better stadium or wowing fans with a mascot who can dunk while backflipping off a ladder.

Now I'll move on to the problems I have with the NBA Draft Lottery as it stands today. One thing the Draft Lottery has done very well is take players away from the teams that sorely need them. Take 1985, the very first year of the Lottery. The Indiana Pacers and Golden State Warriors tied for the league's worst record that year and one reason was that they didn't have a center. Patrick Ewing would have filled that need for either team. Yet, due to the Lottery, he went to the New York Knicks (a team that already did have a center in Bill Cartwright). Other examples over the years:

• 1992: The Minnesota Timberwolves, a team that had been struggling for respectability since joining the league in 1989, had the league's worst record at 15-67, but they ended up with the third pick and missed out on the best centers the '92 Draft had to offer, Shaquille O'Neal and Alonzo Mourning. Instead, the Wolves take forward Christian Laettner.
• 1993: The Dallas Mavericks threaten the 1972-73 Philadelphia 76ers' all-time mark for futility before finishing 11-71. Under the NFL Draft rules, they would have had the first pick. But the Orlando Magic--who narrowly missed the playoffs--end up with the first pick. They select Chris Webber, then deal him to the Golden State Warriors for the third overall pick and three future first-rounders. The Mavericks pick fourth.
• 1997: As mentioned earlier, the San Antonio Spurs were decimated by injuries, but under the NFL Draft rules, they actually would have picked third. Tim Duncan would have gone to the Vancouver Grizzlies (14-68), but because Vancouver fell to fourth in the lottery, they settle for point guard Antonio Daniels, who quickly proves to be a bust and only plays in Vancouver for one season.
• 2005: The Atlanta Hawks, whose best center is 42-year-old Kevin Willis, finish with a sorry 13-69 record. But the top pick in the draft--center Andrew Bogut--goes to the Milwaukee Bucks, who won more than twice as many games as the Hawks.

In the NFL, if a team has a .500 or better record, there's no chance of it having the top pick in the draft (unless they acquired that pick from the team with the worst record). But last year, the Phoenix Suns were in the Draft Lottery because they didn't make the playoffs; never mind that they had a better record (46-36) than four of the Eastern Conference's playoff teams. I touched upon a similar issue in my letter to the News: In 1984, two Western Conference non-playoff teams had better records than the Eastern Conference's #8 seed. To be fair, the Draft Lottery has been improved somewhat over the years. When the Lottery began 25 years ago, every team that didn't make the playoffs had the same chance of getting the first pick, and the team with the worst record could fall as low as seventh. Today, the team with the worst record is guaranteed no lower than the fourth pick, while teams that barely missed the playoffs get about a 0.5% chance of getting the top pick. But in summation, the NBA Draft Lottery is still a flawed system founded on a flawed argument. Let the worst team get the first pick. Period. One postscript I'd like to add: Motta didn't exactly do himself any favors by complaining about the Rockets' throwing away games. His Mavericks owned the Cleveland Cavaliers' first-round pick in 1986. If the 1986 NBA Draft was "NFL-style," that pick would have been the third overall pick. But instead, thanks to the Lottery, it was 7th. I pity the fool who complains like that, and I'm sure Mr. T would agree.

NBA Team Nickname Mix-up So long as I'm talking about the NBA:

Don't you think it would make sense for three certain NBA teams to be called the Utah Bobcats, the Charlotte Hornets and the New Orleans Jazz instead of the mess we have now (Utah Jazz, New Orleans Hornets, Charlotte Bobcats)? Jazz and New Orleans have always been strongly associated with each other, Charlotte's history with teams called the Hornets goes all the way back to 1901 (it had a minor league baseball team by that name until 1973, and the very next year, when the World Football League's New York Stars relocated to Charlotte, they were renamed the Hornets as well). To complete the nickname switcheroo, bobcats are plentiful in Utah!

"Utah Bobcats" also sounds a heck of a lot better than "Utah Thrust," the name I wanted to give the Jazz when they relocated from New Orleans in 1980 because, prior to that relocation, the #1 sporting event in the whole state of Utah was high-speed racing at Bonneville Speedway, where all sorts of land speed records are made and broken.

Volume 5, Number 11: A Little Bit of This, A Little Bit of That

News: The last few weeks have been bad. Storms hit the Southeast, causing flooding in Nashville the likes of which people there have never seen; an oil rig was lost in the Gulf of Mexico, causing ecological disaster along the Gulf Coast; severe storms and tornadoes struck Oklahoma earlier this week; there's been a rash of school attacks in China; there's the threat of a diphtheria epidemic in earthquake-stricken Haiti, and last but not least, a family of four died in Quebec when the ground beneath their house collapsed due to clay liquefaction.

Sports: A mix of good and bad here. The Tigers are off to a good start. I wanted the Cleveland Cavaliers vs. the Dallas Mavericks in the NBA Finals but the Cavs are now down 3 games to 2 against the Boston Celtics, while the Mavs were already eliminated in round 1 against the San Antonio Spurs. The Pistons are in next Tuesday's NBA Draft Lottery; thing is, as much as I'd love for the Pistons to get Kentucky point guard John Wall, I have opposed the Draft Lottery ever since Commissioner David Stern introduced it in 1985 and I prefer the NFL style of drafting (worst team gets the first pick, regardless of conference). The Red Wings are out of the playoffs but maybe it's just as well; they were too inconsistent this year and both the Sharks and Blackhawks are better teams. Personally, I'm rooting for the Blackhawks because their head coach (Joel Quenneville) is one of the NHL's best, and they also have the longest current Stanley Cup drought (no Cup since 1961, and remember, the Wings used to have a drought like that).

Fantasy sports: Smackdown Unlimited (baseball) is off to a surprisingly good start--4th place right now, and 1st as recently as April 29. In football, one league I'm in (Todd's Ultimate Fantasy Football, or TUFF for short) had its rookie draft last week. I thought I did OK--I got QB Jimmy Clausen to give me sorely needed depth at that position but couldn't get a running back to replace Kevin Smith (maybe next year, I can address depth at that position).

Weather: In addition to what I mentioned under News: Temperatures here in the Detroit area dropped this past weekend; it also snowed in parts of Wisconsin and northern Michigan. Did the recent volcanic activity in Iceland have anything to do with it?

TV: I'm getting tired of Operation Repo--you can only watch so many schmucks who fail to understand any part of the statement, "We wouldn't be here if you weren't making the payments." As for Kitchen Nightmares, I like it best when Gordon goes after dirty restaurants (Dillons and the Seascape in 2007 and Fiesta Sunrise in 2008 are prime examples) and there hasn't been such a severe case in this, the third season. Another thing about the new format of KN is that Gordon only stays for three days instead of seven, a result of which is that Gordon can't shut down a restaurant for a day or two (like he did a few times under the old seven-day timetable). I'm looking forward to Season 7 of Hell's Kitchen, which starts on Tuesday, June 1.

Movies: There are a whole bunch I'd like to see but nothing that makes me want to go to the theater and shell out $7+ to see it. At least not until Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Volume I. So instead of waiting for movies to come out in theaters, I've resigned myself to waiting until I can see them on a cable TV network like TNT, TBS, FX, USA, Spike, whatever. So I keep checking the TV listings looking for movies from two or three years ago.

Internet: Family Feud on Facebook is fun (at least when the app works, anyway). I'd rather have a faulty Feud than an error-free FarmVille or Mob Wars.